KING v. COLVIN, CIV 16-0519 SMV. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20161223d53
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, it being stated that opposing counsel concurs in the granting of the Motion, and the Court having read the Motion and being fully advised of the premises, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted through December 23, 2016, to serve his Motion to Reverse of Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Supp
Summary: ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, it being stated that opposing counsel concurs in the granting of the Motion, and the Court having read the Motion and being fully advised of the premises, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted through December 23, 2016, to serve his Motion to Reverse of Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Suppo..
More
ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, it being stated that opposing counsel concurs in the granting of the Motion, and the Court having read the Motion and being fully advised of the premises,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted through December 23, 2016, to serve his Motion to Reverse of Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Supporting Memorandum.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant is granted through February 17, 2017 to serve her Response, and Plaintiff through March 3, 2017 to serve her reply.
Source: Leagle
