LATHAM v. CORIZON, LLC, CV 15-00242-MCA-CG. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20170207c26
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition ("PFRD"), filed on October 24, 2016. (Doc. 111). In the PFRD, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint , (Doc. 92), be denied because Plaintiff fails to state a claim in the proposed amendments. The parties were notified that wr
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition ("PFRD"), filed on October 24, 2016. (Doc. 111). In the PFRD, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint , (Doc. 92), be denied because Plaintiff fails to state a claim in the proposed amendments. The parties were notified that wri..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition ("PFRD"), filed on October 24, 2016. (Doc. 111). In the PFRD, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint, (Doc. 92), be denied because Plaintiff fails to state a claim in the proposed amendments. The parties were notified that written objections to the PFRD were due within fourteen days. (Doc. 111 at 10). No objections have been filed, and the deadline of November 7, 2016, has passed. The recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are adopted by this Court.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint, (Doc. 92), is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
