Mancha v. Berryhill, 1:16-00961-SMV. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20170410f48
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER FOR EXTENSION STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time (Doc. 20) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand to Agency for Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 19), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until May 12, 2017, to file a response, and Plain
Summary: ORDER FOR EXTENSION STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time (Doc. 20) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand to Agency for Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 19), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until May 12, 2017, to file a response, and Plaint..
More
ORDER FOR EXTENSION
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
Upon consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time (Doc. 20) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand to Agency for Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 19), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until May 12, 2017, to file a response, and Plaintiff shall have until June 12, 2017, to file a reply.
FootNotes
1. Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source: Leagle
