U.S. v. A & R PRODUCTIONS, 01cv00072-MV-WPL. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20170810d34
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2017
Summary: ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ZUNI RIVER BASIN ADJUDICATION Subfile No. ZRB-4-0115. WILLIAM P. LYNCH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs' Joint Motion to Set Pretrial Conference is this subfile action (Doc. 3388) is GRANTED. A Pretrial Conference will be held by teleconference on August 24, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. The parties will call the Court's "meet-me" line at (505) 348-2356 to participate in the Pretrial Conference. It is recommended that a reliable long-distance carrier be used t
Summary: ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ZUNI RIVER BASIN ADJUDICATION Subfile No. ZRB-4-0115. WILLIAM P. LYNCH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs' Joint Motion to Set Pretrial Conference is this subfile action (Doc. 3388) is GRANTED. A Pretrial Conference will be held by teleconference on August 24, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. The parties will call the Court's "meet-me" line at (505) 348-2356 to participate in the Pretrial Conference. It is recommended that a reliable long-distance carrier be used to..
More
ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
ZUNI RIVER BASIN ADJUDICATION
Subfile No. ZRB-4-0115.
WILLIAM P. LYNCH, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs' Joint Motion to Set Pretrial Conference is this subfile action (Doc. 3388) is GRANTED. A Pretrial Conference will be held by teleconference on August 24, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. The parties will call the Court's "meet-me" line at (505) 348-2356 to participate in the Pretrial Conference. It is recommended that a reliable long-distance carrier be used to ensure sound quality. This line can only accommodate up to five telephone lines, including the Court's. If the parties anticipate that they will exceed this capacity, they must contact the Court immediately so that alternative arrangements may be made.
Counsel should be prepared to discuss discovery needs and scheduling, all claims and defenses, initial disclosures, and the timing of expert disclosures and reports under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). Counsel should also be prepared to discuss the use of scientific evidence and whether a Daubert hearing is needed.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
Source: Leagle