HALFORD v. BERRYHILL, 16-CV-1267 CG. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20170810d41
Visitors: 31
Filed: Aug. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CARMEN E. GARZA , Magistrate Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Response Brief , (Doc. 18), filed August 7, 2017. The Court, noting that the Motion is unopposed, finds that the Motion is well-taken and should be GRANTED . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendant shall file a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency De
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CARMEN E. GARZA , Magistrate Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Response Brief , (Doc. 18), filed August 7, 2017. The Court, noting that the Motion is unopposed, finds that the Motion is well-taken and should be GRANTED . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendant shall file a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Dec..
More
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
CARMEN E. GARZA, Magistrate Judge
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Response Brief, (Doc. 18), filed August 7, 2017. The Court, noting that the Motion is unopposed, finds that the Motion is well-taken and should be GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Defendant shall file a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision on or before August 22, 2017; and
2. Plaintiff may file a Reply on or before September 5, 2017.
Source: Leagle
