Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CARRILLO v. COLVIN, CV 15-894 WPL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20170906f88 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WILLIAM P. LYNCH , Magistrate Judge . Based on the Social Security Administration's ("SSA") unopposed motion to remand, I remanded this case to the SSA pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) on March 28, 2016. (Doc. 12.) McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493 , 496 n.1 (10th Cir. 2006), dictates that final judgment shall not enter until the remand proceedings are completed and the matter returns to this Court. Accordingly, I have retained jurisdiction. On March 29,
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Based on the Social Security Administration's ("SSA") unopposed motion to remand, I remanded this case to the SSA pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) on March 28, 2016. (Doc. 12.) McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 496 n.1 (10th Cir. 2006), dictates that final judgment shall not enter until the remand proceedings are completed and the matter returns to this Court. Accordingly, I have retained jurisdiction. On March 29, 2016, I ordered the parties to submit periodic status updates every 90 days, with the first such update to be filed on July 1, 2016. The parties submitted their first joint update (Doc. 15), after an Order to Show Cause (Doc. 14), on July 13, 2016. The most recent joint status update was filed on April 18, 2017, and indicated that a hearing was set for May 24, 2017. (Doc. 21.) More than 90 days have elapsed since that time.

Accordingly, the parties will submit a joint status update by August 28, 2017. If the parties are unable to submit a joint status report, each party shall show cause, in writing, why they should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with a Court Order. The show cause responses will be filed no later than 12:00 p.m. on August 29, 2017. Failure to either submit a joint status report or submit separate statements showing cause may result in the parties being sanctioned for failure to comply with a Court Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer