Med Flight Air Ambulance, Inc. v. MGM Resorts International, 1:17-cv-00246-WJ-KRS. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20171117e42
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2017
Summary: ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY ENTRY OF RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER KEVIN R. SWEAZEA , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court following a telephonic status conference held on November 14, 2017. During the conference, the parties and the Court discussed the Court's obligation to enter a scheduling order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 or find good cause to delay entry of such an order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2) (requiring the Court to "issue the scheduling orde
Summary: ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY ENTRY OF RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER KEVIN R. SWEAZEA , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court following a telephonic status conference held on November 14, 2017. During the conference, the parties and the Court discussed the Court's obligation to enter a scheduling order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 or find good cause to delay entry of such an order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2) (requiring the Court to "issue the scheduling order..
More
ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY ENTRY OF RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER
KEVIN R. SWEAZEA, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court following a telephonic status conference held on November 14, 2017. During the conference, the parties and the Court discussed the Court's obligation to enter a scheduling order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 or find good cause to delay entry of such an order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2) (requiring the Court to "issue the scheduling order as soon as is practicable, but unless the judge finds good cause for delay, the judge must issue it within the earlier of 90 days after any defendant has been served with the complaint or 60 days after any defendant has appeared"). After hearing from the parties and in light of the pending motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, the Court found good cause to delay entering a scheduling order.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that good cause exists to delay entering a Rule 16 scheduling order for the reasons stated on the record. The Court shall not issue a scheduling order until resolution of the pending motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Source: Leagle
