LUBOLD v. GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE COMPANY, 17-727 KK/KBM. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20171120d01
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE KIRTAN KHALSA , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 36), filed November 16, 2017. The Court, having considered the Motion and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the Motion is well taken and should be GRANTED . THE COURT FINDS that there is no objection from any party to dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiffs' Complaint and al
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE KIRTAN KHALSA , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 36), filed November 16, 2017. The Court, having considered the Motion and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the Motion is well taken and should be GRANTED . THE COURT FINDS that there is no objection from any party to dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiffs' Complaint and all..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
KIRTAN KHALSA, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 36), filed November 16, 2017. The Court, having considered the Motion and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the Motion is well taken and should be GRANTED.
THE COURT FINDS that there is no objection from any party to dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiffs' Complaint and all claims that were or could have been alleged therein.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' Complaint and all causes of action that were or could have been alleged therein in the above-captioned matter, be dismissed with prejudice, with all parties to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.
Source: Leagle
