Hatten-Gonzales v. Earnest, CIV 88-0385 KG/CG (2017)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20171214f46
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER LOCATION OF MEETING OF THE PARTIES (DOC. 806) KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider Location of Meeting of the Parties (Motion), filed on December 12, 2017. (Doc. 806). The Court is mindful that holding the Court-ordered meeting in Las Cruces is inconvenient to counsel. See Order Setting In-Person Meetings on Present Scope of Consent Decree (Doc. 804). Nevertheless, the C
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER LOCATION OF MEETING OF THE PARTIES (DOC. 806) KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider Location of Meeting of the Parties (Motion), filed on December 12, 2017. (Doc. 806). The Court is mindful that holding the Court-ordered meeting in Las Cruces is inconvenient to counsel. See Order Setting In-Person Meetings on Present Scope of Consent Decree (Doc. 804). Nevertheless, the Co..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER LOCATION OF MEETING OF THE PARTIES (DOC. 806)
KENNETH J. GONZALES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider Location of Meeting of the Parties (Motion), filed on December 12, 2017. (Doc. 806). The Court is mindful that holding the Court-ordered meeting in Las Cruces is inconvenient to counsel. See Order Setting In-Person Meetings on Present Scope of Consent Decree (Doc. 804). Nevertheless, the Court finds that the inconvenience, while personally significant to counsel, is not so extraordinary as to outweigh the need to meet and confer in courthouse space and where the Court is readily available to provide in-person direct guidance and instruction to the parties as necessary. For the above reasons, the Motion is denied
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
