Filed: May 29, 2018
Latest Update: May 29, 2018
Summary: NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER CLARIFYING (DOC. 56) KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendant TitleMax's oral Motion for Clarification. 1 The Court now clarifies, nunc pro tunc , its order of May 2, 2018, (Doc. 56) granting, in part, and denying, in part, Defendant TitleMax's "Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Arbitrate and to Enforce the Arbitration Clause as to All Proposed Class Members Who Did Not Opt-Out of the Arbitration Clause and to Stay All Pro
Summary: NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER CLARIFYING (DOC. 56) KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendant TitleMax's oral Motion for Clarification. 1 The Court now clarifies, nunc pro tunc , its order of May 2, 2018, (Doc. 56) granting, in part, and denying, in part, Defendant TitleMax's "Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Arbitrate and to Enforce the Arbitration Clause as to All Proposed Class Members Who Did Not Opt-Out of the Arbitration Clause and to Stay All Proc..
More
NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER CLARIFYING (DOC. 56)
KENNETH J. GONZALES, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendant TitleMax's oral Motion for Clarification.1 The Court now clarifies, nunc pro tunc, its order of May 2, 2018, (Doc. 56) granting, in part, and denying, in part, Defendant TitleMax's "Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Arbitrate and to Enforce the Arbitration Clause as to All Proposed Class Members Who Did Not Opt-Out of the Arbitration Clause and to Stay All Proceedings or, in the Alternative, to Stay All Class Action Related Discovery and Proceedings Until this Motion is Decided" ("Motion to Compel Arbitration") (Doc. 9), for the reasons stated on the record at the May 2, 2018, telephonic conference. Specifically, and as stated on the record, the Court grants the motion in part to compel arbitration as to the first loan agreement, dated July 19, 2016, and second loan agreement, dated August 6, 2016; and denies the motion in part to compel arbitration as to the third loan agreement, dated May 15, 2017. The Order Compelling Arbitration (Doc. 56) otherwise remains as entered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. On May 29, 2018, this Court held a status conference at which Defendant TitleMax requested clarification regarding the Order Compelling Arbitration (Doc. 56). The Court construes Defendant TitleMax's request as an oral motion.
