Hinkle v. U.S., 1:16-cv-01048 KG/SCY (2018)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20180618781
Visitors: 32
Filed: Jun. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2018
Summary: FINAL ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . Having granted Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33), filed October 26, 2017, by the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously with this Final Order Granting Summary Judgment and of Dismissal of Claims, IT IS ORDERED that 1. summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendant United States as to Plaintiffs R. Bryan Hinkle and Matlida Garcia's Complaint (Doc. 1), f
Summary: FINAL ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . Having granted Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33), filed October 26, 2017, by the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously with this Final Order Granting Summary Judgment and of Dismissal of Claims, IT IS ORDERED that 1. summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendant United States as to Plaintiffs R. Bryan Hinkle and Matlida Garcia's Complaint (Doc. 1), fi..
More
FINAL ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS
KENNETH J. GONZALES, District Judge.
Having granted Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33), filed October 26, 2017, by the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously with this Final Order Granting Summary Judgment and of Dismissal of Claims,
IT IS ORDERED that
1. summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendant United States as to Plaintiffs R. Bryan Hinkle and Matlida Garcia's Complaint (Doc. 1), filed in this case;
2. summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendant United States as to Plaintiff William D. Hinkle's Complaint filed in 1:16-cv-01051-KG-SCY (Doc. 1);
3. summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendant United States as to Plaintiffs Gene E. and Betty L. Hinkle's Complaint filed in 1:16-cv-01052-KG-SCY (Doc. 1);
4. Plaintiffs' claims for tax refunds in all three cases are dismissed with prejudice; and
5. all three cases are now terminated.
Source: Leagle
