Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Chavez v. Berryhill, CV 17-1128 CG. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20181012d46 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER EAJA CARMEN E. GARZA , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Stipulated Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, (Doc. 23), filed October 9, `. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, noting it is unopposed, and being otherwise fully advised, finds that the Motion is well-taken and should be GRANTED . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that attorney fees be awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 2
More

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER EAJA

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Stipulated Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, (Doc. 23), filed October 9, `. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, noting it is unopposed, and being otherwise fully advised, finds that the Motion is well-taken and should be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that attorney fees be awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), ("EAJA"), payable to Plaintiff in the amount of $5,660.18. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, if Plaintiff's counsel receives attorney fees and costs under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff's counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer