Alonso v. Barham, 16-cv-0903MV/SMV. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20181114g19
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Discovery in this matter is stayed. 1 Counsel for Defendant Barham must file a status report no later than December 31, 2018 , updating the Court on the status of the related criminal proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. On November 4, 2016, Defendant Barham requested that the Court stay discovery proceedings in this case because her underlying criminal case had been st
Summary: ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Discovery in this matter is stayed. 1 Counsel for Defendant Barham must file a status report no later than December 31, 2018 , updating the Court on the status of the related criminal proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. On November 4, 2016, Defendant Barham requested that the Court stay discovery proceedings in this case because her underlying criminal case had been sta..
More
ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Discovery in this matter is stayed.1 Counsel for Defendant Barham must file a status report no later than December 31, 2018, updating the Court on the status of the related criminal proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. On November 4, 2016, Defendant Barham requested that the Court stay discovery proceedings in this case because her underlying criminal case had been stayed after she filed a "Notice of Inability to Proceed to Trial Due to Incompetency of Defendant Due to Medical Conditions and Notice of Diminished Capacity." [Docs. 20, 20-1]. The request was unopposed, and the Court stayed proceedings for 60 days. [Doc. 21]. The Court extended the stay for another 90 days on Defendant Barham's second unopposed request. [Doc. 24]. On May 12, 2017, the Court granted Defendant Barham's motion for a continued stay because her criminal proceedings remain stayed pending resolution of her claim of incompetency. [Doc. 35].
Source: Leagle
