Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

O.F. v. Walden, 16-84 KG/GBW. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20190214e99 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO LIFT STAY GREGORY B. WORMUTH , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay. Doc. 52. On April 25, 2016, the Court granted Defendant Walden's Motion to Stay Proceedings, pending the termination of the criminal investigation of Defendant Walden and related proceedings. Doc. 18. In his Motion, Plaintiff notes the length of the stay and asserts that "most criminal trials are completed" in a far shorter time. Doc. 52 at
More

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO LIFT STAY

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay. Doc. 52. On April 25, 2016, the Court granted Defendant Walden's Motion to Stay Proceedings, pending the termination of the criminal investigation of Defendant Walden and related proceedings. Doc. 18. In his Motion, Plaintiff notes the length of the stay and asserts that "most criminal trials are completed" in a far shorter time. Doc. 52 at 2. Plaintiff also notes Defendant Walden's failure to file the quarterly reports as ordered. Id.

While the Court shares Plaintiff's frustration with the length of the stay, it is clear that the considerations which led the Court to originally impose the stay remain in full effect. For that reason and for the reasons discussed in the Court's previous order denying Plaintiff's earlier motion to lift the stay (doc. 45), the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer