Filed: Mar. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER VACATING INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Vacate Initial Scheduling Order, (Doc. 7), filed March 29, 2019. The parties state that on March 14, 2019, Defendant filed a Third-Party Complaint adding two Third-Party Defendants, (Doc. 6). The parties ask the Court to vacate the Initial Scheduling Order, (Doc. 5), and enter an amended scheduling order afte
Summary: ORDER VACATING INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Vacate Initial Scheduling Order, (Doc. 7), filed March 29, 2019. The parties state that on March 14, 2019, Defendant filed a Third-Party Complaint adding two Third-Party Defendants, (Doc. 6). The parties ask the Court to vacate the Initial Scheduling Order, (Doc. 5), and enter an amended scheduling order after..
More
ORDER VACATING INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
CARMEN E. GARZA, Chief Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Vacate Initial Scheduling Order, (Doc. 7), filed March 29, 2019. The parties state that on March 14, 2019, Defendant filed a Third-Party Complaint adding two Third-Party Defendants, (Doc. 6). The parties ask the Court to vacate the Initial Scheduling Order, (Doc. 5), and enter an amended scheduling order after the Third-Party Defendants have answered the Third-Party Complaint. The Court, having read the Motion, noting it is unopposed, and being otherwise fully advised, finds that the Motion is well-taken and should be GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' Joint Motion to Vacate Initial Scheduling Order, (Doc. 7), is GRANTED and the Court's Initial Scheduling Order, (Doc. 5), and the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for April 9, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. are VACATED.
