Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mills v. Berryhill, 18-1031 SMV. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20190408d28 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, it being stated that opposing counsel concurs in the granting of the Motion, and the Court having read the Motion and being fully advised of the premises, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted through April 18, 2019, to serve his Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Supporti
More

ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, it being stated that opposing counsel concurs in the granting of the Motion, and the Court having read the Motion and being fully advised of the premises,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted through April 18, 2019, to serve his Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Supporting Memorandum.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant is granted through June 13, 2019 to serve her Response, and Plaintiff through July 11, 2019 to serve his Reply.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer