Nino v. Berryhill, 18-cv-1224SMV. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20190410e71
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court for scheduling, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Supporting Memorandum no later than June 5, 2019; (2) Defendant shall file a Response no later than July 31, 2019; (3) Plaintiff may file a Reply no later than August 28, 2019; (4) All supporting memoranda filed pursuant to this Order shall ci
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court for scheduling, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Supporting Memorandum no later than June 5, 2019; (2) Defendant shall file a Response no later than July 31, 2019; (3) Plaintiff may file a Reply no later than August 28, 2019; (4) All supporting memoranda filed pursuant to this Order shall cit..
More
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court for scheduling, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Supporting Memorandum no later than June 5, 2019;
(2) Defendant shall file a Response no later than July 31, 2019;
(3) Plaintiff may file a Reply no later than August 28, 2019;
(4) All supporting memoranda filed pursuant to this Order shall cite the transcript or record in support of assertions of fact and shall cite authority in support of propositions of law; and
(5) All requests for extensions of time altering the deadlines set in this Order shall be made through a motion to the Court. If the parties concur in seeking an extension of time, they shall submit a stipulated proposed order for Court approval.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle