Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Aragon v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, 18-1101 JAP/CG. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20190425c50 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO BIFURCATE AND STAY PLAINTIFF'S EXTRA-CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate and Stay Discovery and Proceedings as to Plaintiff's Extra-Contractual Claims, (Doc. 23), filed April 10, 2019. The Court ordered expedited briefing on the Motion, (Doc. 24), and was subsequently informed that Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant's Motion. Having reviewed the Moti
More

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO BIFURCATE AND STAY PLAINTIFF'S EXTRA-CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate and Stay Discovery and Proceedings as to Plaintiff's Extra-Contractual Claims, (Doc. 23), filed April 10, 2019. The Court ordered expedited briefing on the Motion, (Doc. 24), and was subsequently informed that Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant's Motion. Having reviewed the Motion, record of the case, and relevant law, the Court will grant the Motion in part as set forth below.

In the Motion, Defendant asks the Court to bifurcate Plaintiff's extra-contractual claims from his contractual claims and stay discovery and all proceedings as to the extra-contractual claims. (Doc. 23 at 1). Defendant argues that Plaintiff's extra-contractual claims are predicated on him establishing a contractual breach and the amount of damages he is owed on his contractual claims. Id. at 5-8. Therefore, Defendant states it would be prejudiced if it has to provide discovery and proceed on Plaintiff's extra-contractual claims at this time. Id. at 8-10.

Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant's Motion. Since the parties agree that bifurcation of discovery would be appropriate in this case, the Court will grant the Motion as to Defendant's request to bifurcate discovery. However, the Court cannot bifurcate the trial as to Plaintiff's extra-contractual claims as that would be for the presiding judge to determine.

The Court will require the parties to file a Joint Status Report and Proposed Discovery Plan no later than May 3, 2019, setting forth their proposed deadlines for bifurcated discovery. The Court notes that the parties have been engaged in discovery since January 15, 2019, their discovery deadline is July 15, 2019, and a trial has been set for December 2, 2019. (Docs. 15, 18). Therefore, the Court directs the parties to keep these dates in mind as they prepare their proposed discovery plan.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate and Stay Discovery and Proceedings as to Plaintiff's Extra-Contractual Claims, (Doc. 23), is GRANTED IN PART and the Court will allow the parties to proceed with bifurcated discovery.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a Joint Status Report and Proposed Discovery Plan no later than May 3, 2019, setting forth their proposed deadlines for bifurcated discovery.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer