Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gonzales v. Berryhill, CV 18-535 CG. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20190514b41 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 13, 2019
Latest Update: May 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412, (Doc. 24), filed May 8, 2019, in which the parties agree to an award of $4,666.20 in attorney fees. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $4,666.20 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Acc
More

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, (Doc. 24), filed May 8, 2019, in which the parties agree to an award of $4,666.20 in attorney fees.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $4,666.20 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591-93 (2010) (providing EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff's counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), Section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff's counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer