Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sanchez v. Berryhill, CV 18-586 CG. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20190618d66 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act , (Doc. 33), filed June 14, 2019, in which the parties agree to an award of $5,400 in attorney fees. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $5,400 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2
More

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, (Doc. 33), filed June 14, 2019, in which the parties agree to an award of $5,400 in attorney fees.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $5,400 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591-93 (2010) (providing EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff's counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), Section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff's counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer