ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

LAURA FASHING, Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on plaintiff Isaac Montaño's Motion for Appointment of Counsel, filed on June 14, 2019. Doc. 154. Defendant Centurion filed its response on June 25, 2019. Doc. 155. Mr. Montaño filed his reply on July 11, 2019. Doc. 158. Having read the submissions of the parties and being fully advised, the Court finds that the motion is not well taken and will DENY it.

There is no right to appointment of counsel in a civil rights case. Instead, the decision whether to request assistance of counsel rests in the sound discretion of the Court. Beaudry v. Corrections Corp. of America, 331 F.3d 1164, 1169 (10th Cir.2003); MacCuish v. United States, 844 F.2d 733, 735 (10th Cir.1988). In determining whether to appoint counsel, the district court should consider the merits of the litigant's claims, the nature and complexity of the factual and legal issues, and the litigant's ability to investigate the facts and to present his claims. Hill v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 393 F.3d 1111, 1115 (10th Cir.2004).

Mr. Montaño has been representing himself since his attorneys withdrew on June 1, 2018. Docs 98, 99. The Court has reviewed Mr. Montaño's filings since that time in light of the foregoing factors. Mr. Montaño appears to understand the issues in the case and to be representing himself in an intelligent and capable manner. See Lucero v. Gunter, 52 F.3d 874, 878 (10th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the Court will deny Mr. Montaño's motion to appoint counsel.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff Isaac Montaño's Motion for Appointment of Counsel filed on June 14, 2019 (Doc. 154), is DENIED.