Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Garcia-Marquez v. Saul, 19-598 GBW. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20191218f77 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF BRIEFING DEADLINES GREGORY B. WORMUTH , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Her Motion. Doc. 23. Plaintiff does not indicate in her motion whether she sought Defendant's concurrence or whether Defendant opposes her request for extension. Under Local Rule 7.1(a), a party must seek concurrence for her motion and indicate whether the motion is opposed or else her motion may be denied
More

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF BRIEFING DEADLINES

This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Her Motion. Doc. 23. Plaintiff does not indicate in her motion whether she sought Defendant's concurrence or whether Defendant opposes her request for extension. Under Local Rule 7.1(a), a party must seek concurrence for her motion and indicate whether the motion is opposed or else her motion may be denied. See D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.1(a). However, given that Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court will overlook the omission on this occasion. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion and hereby extends the briefing deadlines in this case by fourteen (14) days.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

(1) Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Supporting Memorandum on or before December 31, 2019; (2) Defendant shall file a Response on or before March 2, 2020; (3) Plaintiff may file a Reply on or before March 16, 2020; (4) All supporting memoranda filed pursuant to this Order shall cite the transcript or record in support of assertions of fact and shall cite authority1 in support of propositions of law; and 5) All requests for extension of time altering the deadlines herein shall be made through a motion to the Court. If the parties concur in seeking an extension of time, they shall submit a stipulated proposed order to the Court for approval.

FootNotes


1. Citation of unpublished opinions must be in accordance with Tenth Circuit Rule 32.1.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer