Mingo v. Saul, CIV 1:19-440. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20200124e93
Visitors: 32
Filed: Jan. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2020
Summary: ORDER FOR EXTENSION STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Second Extension of Time (Doc. 23) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 18), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until February 21, 2020, to file a response and Plaintiff shall have until March 6, 2020, to file a r
Summary: ORDER FOR EXTENSION STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Second Extension of Time (Doc. 23) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 18), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until February 21, 2020, to file a response and Plaintiff shall have until March 6, 2020, to file a re..
More
ORDER FOR EXTENSION
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
Upon consideration of Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Second Extension of Time (Doc. 23) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 18), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until February 21, 2020, to file a response and Plaintiff shall have until March 6, 2020, to file a reply.
Source: Leagle
