Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mosaic Potash Carlsbad, Inc. v. Intrepid Potash, Inc., 16-0808 KG/SMV. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20200205f95 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF REFERENCE KENNETH J. GONZALES , Magistrate Judge . In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10 th Cir. 1990), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Attorney's Eyes Only Des
More

ORDER OF REFERENCE

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Attorney's Eyes Only Designation Made Pusuant to Stipulated Protection Orders (Doc. 322). The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties will be given the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the proposed disposition.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer