Mingo v. Saul, 1:19-cv-00440-SMV. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20200224a85
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: ORDER STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), by and through his counsel, has filed an unopposed motion with this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The Court, noting that the Motion is unopposed, finds that the Motion is well-taken and should be GRANTED. Upon remand, the Social Security Administr
Summary: ORDER STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), by and through his counsel, has filed an unopposed motion with this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The Court, noting that the Motion is unopposed, finds that the Motion is well-taken and should be GRANTED. Upon remand, the Social Security Administra..
More
ORDER
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), by and through his counsel, has filed an unopposed motion with this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The Court, noting that the Motion is unopposed, finds that the Motion is well-taken and should be GRANTED. Upon remand, the Social Security Administration's Appeals Council will remand the matter to a new ALJ for a de novo hearing and new decision.
This Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a REMAND to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.1 See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
FootNotes
1. The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 58.
Source: Leagle
