Archuleta v. Bettes, 1:19-cv-00682-MV-JHR. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20200317c42
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2020
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL MARTHA V ZQUEZ , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Order to file a more definite statement of the claims in his Complaint. See Doc. 14, filed February 28, 2020. Defendants filed a motion for a more definite statement asserting that Plaintiff's "Complaint consists of citations to numerous federal statutory and constitutional provisions without any discernible explanation as to h
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL MARTHA V ZQUEZ , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Order to file a more definite statement of the claims in his Complaint. See Doc. 14, filed February 28, 2020. Defendants filed a motion for a more definite statement asserting that Plaintiff's "Complaint consists of citations to numerous federal statutory and constitutional provisions without any discernible explanation as to ho..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Order to file a more definite statement of the claims in his Complaint. See Doc. 14, filed February 28, 2020.
Defendants filed a motion for a more definite statement asserting that Plaintiff's "Complaint consists of citations to numerous federal statutory and constitutional provisions without any discernible explanation as to how such authority is implicated or how Plaintiff is entitled to relief pursuant to such authority against these Defendants." Doc. 8 at 1, filed October 7, 2019. Plaintiff did not file a response opposing the motion.
The Court granted Defendants' motion for a more definite statement because there are no factual allegations supporting many of the claims pursuant to the numerous federal statutory and constitutional provisions. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a more definite statement of the claims asserted in his Complaint and notified Plaintiff that failure to timely file a more definite statement may result in dismissal of this case. See Doc. 14 at 4. Plaintiff did not file a more definite statement by the March 14, 2020, deadline.
IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
