PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

CARMEN E. GARZA, Chief Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Enlargement of Time for Plaintiffs to File Amendments to Pleadings and Join Additional Parties (the "Motion to Extend"), (Doc. 64), filed February 13, 2020, and Defendants Larry and Beverly Blanks' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Amendments to Pleadings and Join Additional Parties (the "Response to Motion to Extend"), (Doc. 69), filed February 27, 2020. On February 20, 2020, the Honorable Kenneth J. Gonzales referred this matter to the undersigned to issue findings of fact, conduct legal analysis, and recommend an ultimate disposition. (Doc. 67).

In their Response to Motion to Extend, Defendants explain they "do not oppose the relief requested by Plaintiffs in their Motion." (Doc. 69 at 2). Plaintiffs did not file a reply addressing Defendants' purported consent to their Motion to Extend. Instead, Plaintiffs filed a renewed, or "amended" Motion to Extend. (Doc. 72 at 3). As a result, the Court construes Plaintiffs' Amended Motion to Extend as superseding their original Motion to Extend. As such, the Court RECOMMENDS Plaintiffs' Motion for Enlargement of Time for Plaintiffs to File Amendments to Pleadings and Join Additional Parties, (Doc. 64), be DENIED AS MOOT. The Court will address the merits of Plaintiffs' Amended Motion to Extend, (Doc. 72), by separate Order.