Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NEELY v. CHAMPION EXPOSITION SERVICES, LLC, 2:11-cv-0469-JCM-CWH. (2011)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20111213942 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 12, 2011
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2011
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Todd Neely and Xpertes, LLC d/b/a Xpert Exposition Services (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs"), by and through their respective attorneys, filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (hereinafter "Motion"). (Docket No. 11). Defendants Champion Exposition Services, LLC and Champion Exposition Services of Illinois, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys, filed their Opposi
More

ORDER

JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Todd Neely and Xpertes, LLC d/b/a Xpert Exposition Services (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs"), by and through their respective attorneys, filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (hereinafter "Motion"). (Docket No. 11). Defendants Champion Exposition Services, LLC and Champion Exposition Services of Illinois, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys, filed their Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion (Docket No. 18) and their Countermotion to Transfer Venue (hereinafter referred to as "Countermotion"). (Docket No. 19). Plaintiffs filed their Reply in support of their Motion and Opposition to Defendants' Countermotion (Docket No. 27). Defendants filed their Reply in support of their Countermotion (Docket No. 30). Plaintiffs filed an Application for oral argument (Docket No. 32).

The matter came before this Court for hearing on November 9, 2011. Having considered Plaintiffs' Motion and Reply in support of their Motion and their Opposition to Defendants' Countermotion, Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion, Countermotion and Reply in support of their Countermotion, and all the briefs and arguments of counsel which were previously presented to the Court regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Countermotion to Transfer Venue, and with good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404, Defendants' Countermotion to Transfer Venue of the above-captioned matter to the U. S. District Court, District of Delaware is GRANTED and this litigation shall be transferred to the Court for all further proceedings; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court has deferred its ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 11).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer