Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MORADI v. ADELSON, 2:11-cv-00490-GMN-RJJ (Base Case) (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20120106666 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Consolidated Complaint until Disposition of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or Stay (ECF No. 76). Plaintiffs oppose any enlargement of time to file an answer to the Amended Complaint past the agreed upon date of January 31, 2012. ( See Order on Stipulation, ECF No. 81). The Court finds that it would be appropriate to allow the enlargement of time in this shareholder derivative suit bec
More

ORDER

GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Consolidated Complaint until Disposition of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or Stay (ECF No. 76). Plaintiffs oppose any enlargement of time to file an answer to the Amended Complaint past the agreed upon date of January 31, 2012. (See Order on Stipulation, ECF No. 81).

The Court finds that it would be appropriate to allow the enlargement of time in this shareholder derivative suit because the ultimate costs associated with the filing of unnecessary pleadings is bore by the shareholders.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Enlarge Time (ECF No. 76) is GRANTED. Defendants will have fourteen (14) days from the date this Court renders a decision on the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 77) to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer