U.S. v. LILLARD, 2:06-CR-00291-PMP-LRL. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120228b02
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Before the Court for consideration is Defendant/Petitioner Lonnie Lillard's Motion for Recusal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 144 and 455 (Doc. #285) filed February 24, 2012. Undoubtedly, the adverse rulings cited by Defendant Lillard in his motion are a source of disappointment and frustration. The situation is complicated further by the fact that Defendant Lillard is a Defendant in two other cases before the undersigned, 2:10-cv-00156-PMP and 2:08-cv-00
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Before the Court for consideration is Defendant/Petitioner Lonnie Lillard's Motion for Recusal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 144 and 455 (Doc. #285) filed February 24, 2012. Undoubtedly, the adverse rulings cited by Defendant Lillard in his motion are a source of disappointment and frustration. The situation is complicated further by the fact that Defendant Lillard is a Defendant in two other cases before the undersigned, 2:10-cv-00156-PMP and 2:08-cv-006..
More
ORDER
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is Defendant/Petitioner Lonnie Lillard's Motion for Recusal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 144 and 455 (Doc. #285) filed February 24, 2012.
Undoubtedly, the adverse rulings cited by Defendant Lillard in his motion are a source of disappointment and frustration. The situation is complicated further by the fact that Defendant Lillard is a Defendant in two other cases before the undersigned, 2:10-cv-00156-PMP and 2:08-cv-00679-PMP. Nevertheless, the adverse rulings cited by Defendant Lillard as a basis for his Motion for Recusal do not warrant the relief requested. Additionally, the Court hereby notifies Mr. Lillard that the Honorable Lawrence R. Leavitt, United States District Judge, has retired from the Court effective October 2011 and is no longer assigned to any of Defendant Lillard's cases.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Lonnie Lillard's Motion for Recusal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 144 and 455 (Doc. #285) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
