U.S. v. DE RONG SHANG, 2:11-CR-0110-RLH-VCF. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120302c06
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#125, filed January 26, 2012), entered by the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment (#82). Defendant's Objections to Report and Recommendation (#149) of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed, in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Summary: ORDER ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#125, filed January 26, 2012), entered by the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment (#82). Defendant's Objections to Report and Recommendation (#149) of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed, in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. ..
More
ORDER
ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge.
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#125, filed January 26, 2012), entered by the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment (#82). Defendant's Objections to Report and Recommendation (#149) of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed, in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The United States filed a Response (#156) thereto, and the matter was submitted for consideration.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Ferenbach should be accepted and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#125, entered January 26, 2012) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, Defendant's Motion (#82) is denied.
Source: Leagle
