STOFFELS v. DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC., 3:08-CV-00468-ECR-GWF. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120319765
Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2012
Summary: Order EDWARD C. REED, District Judge. On February 29, 2012, we ordered (#232) the parties to file their proposed pretrial orders within fourteen (14) days, alternatively permitting Defendants to dismiss the remaining counterclaim for equitable subrogation which would close the case. The parties have failed to comply with the order (#232) in any respect. This is the second time they have failed to file their respective proposed pretrial orders. IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the par
Summary: Order EDWARD C. REED, District Judge. On February 29, 2012, we ordered (#232) the parties to file their proposed pretrial orders within fourteen (14) days, alternatively permitting Defendants to dismiss the remaining counterclaim for equitable subrogation which would close the case. The parties have failed to comply with the order (#232) in any respect. This is the second time they have failed to file their respective proposed pretrial orders. IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the part..
More
Order
EDWARD C. REED, District Judge.
On February 29, 2012, we ordered (#232) the parties to file their proposed pretrial orders within fourteen (14) days, alternatively permitting Defendants to dismiss the remaining counterclaim for equitable subrogation which would close the case.
The parties have failed to comply with the order (#232) in any respect. This is the second time they have failed to file their respective proposed pretrial orders.
IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall have seven (7) additional days within which to comply with the order (#232). If they fail to do so a third time, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
