BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. D.M.S.I., LLC, 2:11-cv-1778-LRH-VCF. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120406585
Filed: Mar. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2012
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before the court is defendants motion to dismiss. Doc. #13. After the filing of defendants' motion to dismiss, plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company ("Branch Banking") filed an amended complaint. Doc. #14. The filing of the amended complaint supersedes the original complaint in its entirety. Accordingly, moving defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is now moot. Therefore, the court shall deny the motion to dismiss without prejudice to allow mov
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before the court is defendants motion to dismiss. Doc. #13. After the filing of defendants' motion to dismiss, plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company ("Branch Banking") filed an amended complaint. Doc. #14. The filing of the amended complaint supersedes the original complaint in its entirety. Accordingly, moving defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is now moot. Therefore, the court shall deny the motion to dismiss without prejudice to allow movi..
More
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Before the court is defendants motion to dismiss. Doc. #13.
After the filing of defendants' motion to dismiss, plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company ("Branch Banking") filed an amended complaint. Doc. #14. The filing of the amended complaint supersedes the original complaint in its entirety. Accordingly, moving defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is now moot. Therefore, the court shall deny the motion to dismiss without prejudice to allow moving defendants an opportunity to respond to the amended complaint.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. #13) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
