BOCK v. ASTRUE, 3:10-cv-00532-LRH-WGC. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120409453
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#13 1 ) entered on February 3, 2012, recommending denying Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal of the Commissioner's Decision (#9) filed on March 9, 2011; granting Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#11) filed on April 8, 2011; and affirming the Administrative Law Judge's decision. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#13 1 ) entered on February 3, 2012, recommending denying Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal of the Commissioner's Decision (#9) filed on March 9, 2011; granting Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#11) filed on April 8, 2011; and affirming the Administrative Law Judge's decision. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was r..
More
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#131) entered on February 3, 2012, recommending denying Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal of the Commissioner's Decision (#9) filed on March 9, 2011; granting Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#11) filed on April 8, 2011; and affirming the Administrative Law Judge's decision. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#13) entered on February 3, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#13) entered on February 3, 2012, is adopted and accepted as follows:
• Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal of the Commissioner's Decision (#9) is DENIED;
• Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#11) is GRANTED; and
• The decision of the Administrative Law Judge is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Refers to court's docket number.
Source: Leagle
