Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

VALDEZ v. COX COMMUNICATIONS OF LAS VEGAS, INC., 2:09-CV-01797-PMP-RJJ. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20120411849 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. On September 30, 2011, Defendant Quality Communications, Inc. filed a Notice of Quality Communications, Inc.'s Second Offer of Judgment and Valdez's Acceptance (Doc. #272). Quality's Second Offer of Judgment fully settled the individual claims of Plaintiff Joseph Valdez against Quality for unpaid overtime and liquidated damages in the total sum of $10,000 plus costs and reasonable attorney's fees accrued on his individual claim only against Quality Communi
More

ORDER

PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.

On September 30, 2011, Defendant Quality Communications, Inc. filed a Notice of Quality Communications, Inc.'s Second Offer of Judgment and Valdez's Acceptance (Doc. #272). Quality's Second Offer of Judgment fully settled the individual claims of Plaintiff Joseph Valdez against Quality for unpaid overtime and liquidated damages in the total sum of $10,000 plus costs and reasonable attorney's fees accrued on his individual claim only against Quality Communications, Inc. as of September 20, 2011, to be determined by the Court.

On October 14, 2011, the Clerk of Court filed a Third Amended Consent Judgment in favor of Joseph Valdez and against Quality Communications, Inc. reflecting the above settlement (Doc. #284).

On October 31, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Judgment (Doc. #292). On November 4, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs against Defendant Quality Communications, Inc. (Doc. #295). On December 5, 2011, Defendant Quality Communications, Inc. filed its Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Void Judgment or Alternatively for Sanctions (Doc. #309). Included in that Response were Defendant Quality Communications, Inc.'s Countermotions to Enforce Rule 68 Judgment (Doc. #311) and for Sanctions (Doc. #312).

Having read and considered the foregoing fully briefed Motions,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Void Judgment Against Defendant Quality Communications, or Alternatively for Sanctions (Doc. #292) is DENIED. 2. To the extent Plaintiff's Motion to Turnover Funds (Doc. #292) seeks payment of $10,000.00 plus interest accruing from September 30, 2011, in accord with the Third Amended Consent Judgment, said Motion is GRANTED. Said sums shall be paid by Quality Communications, Inc. to Plaintiff within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. 3. Plaintiff's Motion for An Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs (Doc. #295) is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant Quality Communications, Inc., shall pay to Plaintiff the sum of $50,301.56 as and for attorney's fees and costs in the sum of $2728.60, said sums to be paid by Quality Communications, Inc. to Plaintiff withing fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. 4. Defendant Quality Communications, Inc.'s Countermotion to Enforce Rule 68 Judgment (Doc. #311) is GRANTED and upon payment of the $10,000.00 Offer of Judgment, interest, attorney's fees and costs ordered above, this action is terminated as between Plaintiff Valdez and Defendant Quality Communications, Inc. 5. Defendant Quality Communications's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1927 (Doc. #312) is DENIED.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer