STEVENS v. LL BRADFORD, INC., 2:12-cv-00030-ECR-GWF. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120412c72
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court on January 9, 2012. Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss (#7) on February 16, 2012. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 day
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court on January 9, 2012. Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss (#7) on February 16, 2012. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court on January 9, 2012. Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss (#7) on February 16, 2012. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order not later than April 23, 2012 in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Source: Leagle