Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STEVENS v. LL BRADFORD, INC., 2:12-cv-30 ECR-GWF. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20120424d91 Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge. Defendant, the United States of America, and the plaintiffs, Ritchie N. Stevens and Julie Keen-Stevens, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move the Court to continue the deadline to file a Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order until after the Court rules on the pending motion to dismiss filed in this matter. The parties set forth the following in support of this motion: 1. Plaintiffs brought this ac
More

ORDER RE:

JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE

GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.

Defendant, the United States of America, and the plaintiffs, Ritchie N. Stevens and Julie Keen-Stevens, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move the Court to continue the deadline to file a Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order until after the Court rules on the pending motion to dismiss filed in this matter. The parties set forth the following in support of this motion:

1. Plaintiffs brought this action in Nevada state court to quash an Internal Revenue Service summons served on defendant LL Bradford, Inc. The United States removed this matter to this Court on January 9, 2012.

2. On February 16, 2012, the United States filed a motion to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the plaintiffs filed a response on March 2, 2012.

3. The parties respectfully request that in the interest of judicial economy and conserving resources the deadline to file the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order be continued until after the Court rules on the pending motion to dismiss this matter.

4. Counsel for defendant LL Bradford, Inc., Louis E. Garfinkel, stated that he had no opposition to the instant motion.

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the deadline to file the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order be continued until 10 days after the Court rules on the pending motion to dismiss, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that service of the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE has been made this 23rd day of April, 2012, by depositing a copy thereof in the United States Mail in a postage prepaid envelope addressed to:

Louis E. Garfinkel, Esq. LEVINE GARFINKEL & KATZ 3441 S. Eastern Avenue Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 /s/ Virginia Cronan Lowe VIRGINIA CRONAN LOWE Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer