FLORIO v. VISTA PACIFIC HOLDINGS, 2:11-cv-1991-KJD-RJJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120426b04
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order (#57) filed by the Plaintiff, Jennifer T. Florio. The Court having reviewed the proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order (#57) finds that it is not jointly filed as required by the rules. Additionally, the Court finds that discovery in this case has been stayed. See, Order (#54). Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the proposed Discovery Plan/Sch
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order (#57) filed by the Plaintiff, Jennifer T. Florio. The Court having reviewed the proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order (#57) finds that it is not jointly filed as required by the rules. Additionally, the Court finds that discovery in this case has been stayed. See, Order (#54). Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the proposed Discovery Plan/Sche..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order (#57) filed by the Plaintiff, Jennifer T. Florio.
The Court having reviewed the proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order (#57) finds that it is not jointly filed as required by the rules. Additionally, the Court finds that discovery in this case has been stayed. See, Order (#54). Good cause appearing therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order (#57) filed by the Plaintiff, Jennifer T. Florio is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
