U.S. v. IBARRA, 2:08-cr-051-RLH-PAL. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120511969
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 09, 2012
Latest Update: May 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER (Letter/Motion—#32) ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Before the Court is a letter, docketed as a motion (#32, filed January 21, 2009). Defendant asks when his sentence started and where to send the $100 special assessment. The second question is answered in the Judgment (#31) and the Notice of Judgment (#33, filed April 3, 2009). The $100 was remitted on motion by the Government, which means Mr. Ibarra does not have to pay it. The first question, as to when his sentence started, can onl
Summary: ORDER (Letter/Motion—#32) ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Before the Court is a letter, docketed as a motion (#32, filed January 21, 2009). Defendant asks when his sentence started and where to send the $100 special assessment. The second question is answered in the Judgment (#31) and the Notice of Judgment (#33, filed April 3, 2009). The $100 was remitted on motion by the Government, which means Mr. Ibarra does not have to pay it. The first question, as to when his sentence started, can only..
More
ORDER
(Letter/Motion—#32)
ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge.
Before the Court is a letter, docketed as a motion (#32, filed January 21, 2009).
Defendant asks when his sentence started and where to send the $100 special assessment. The second question is answered in the Judgment (#31) and the Notice of Judgment (#33, filed April 3, 2009). The $100 was remitted on motion by the Government, which means Mr. Ibarra does not have to pay it.
The first question, as to when his sentence started, can only be answered by the Bureau of Prisons, who makes that determination.
Accordingly, to the extent this Order answers Defendant's questions, the Letter/Motion—#32 is moot and will be denied on that basis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
