MARTINEZ v. PALMER, 3:10-CV-00777-ECR-(VPC). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120522a47
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 21, 2012
Latest Update: May 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER EDWARD C. REED, District Judge. Petitioner has filed a first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (#29). The court has reviewed it pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Respondents will need to respond to it. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the first amended petition (#29). If respondents file and serve an ans
Summary: ORDER EDWARD C. REED, District Judge. Petitioner has filed a first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (#29). The court has reviewed it pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Respondents will need to respond to it. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the first amended petition (#29). If respondents file and serve an answ..
More
ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, District Judge.
Petitioner has filed a first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (#29). The court has reviewed it pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Respondents will need to respond to it.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the first amended petition (#29). If respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply.
Source: Leagle
