RUSSO v. LOPEZ, 2:11-CV-00284-PMP-GWF. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120531b66
Visitors: 19
Filed: May 29, 2012
Latest Update: May 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Having read and considered Defendants' fully briefed Motion to Strike the Second Amended Complaint as Untimely, Contrary to this Court's Order of March 12, 2012, and in Violation of Civil Rule 15 (Doc. 111), and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike the Second Amended Complaint as Untimely, Contrary to this Court's Order of March 12, 2012, and in Violation of Civil Rule 15 (Doc. #111) is DENIED.
ORDER
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
Having read and considered Defendants' fully briefed Motion to Strike the Second Amended Complaint as Untimely, Contrary to this Court's Order of March 12, 2012, and in Violation of Civil Rule 15 (Doc. 111), and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike the Second Amended Complaint as Untimely, Contrary to this Court's Order of March 12, 2012, and in Violation of Civil Rule 15 (Doc. #111) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
