Filed: May 31, 2012
Latest Update: May 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is the matter of Cernetich, et al. v. Jones, et al. (Case No.2:09-cv-01115-JCM-VCF). On April 18, 2012, pursuant to Local Rule 41-1, the clerk of the court informed plaintiff that, if no action was taken in this case within thirty (30) days, the court would dismiss the case for want of prosecution. (Doc. #108). To date, plaintiff having taken no further action to prosecute this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREE
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is the matter of Cernetich, et al. v. Jones, et al. (Case No.2:09-cv-01115-JCM-VCF). On April 18, 2012, pursuant to Local Rule 41-1, the clerk of the court informed plaintiff that, if no action was taken in this case within thirty (30) days, the court would dismiss the case for want of prosecution. (Doc. #108). To date, plaintiff having taken no further action to prosecute this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the matter of Cernetich, et al. v. Jones, et al. (Case No.2:09-cv-01115-JCM-VCF).
On April 18, 2012, pursuant to Local Rule 41-1, the clerk of the court informed plaintiff that, if no action was taken in this case within thirty (30) days, the court would dismiss the case for want of prosecution. (Doc. #108). To date, plaintiff having taken no further action to prosecute this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the case of Cernetich, et al. v. Jones, et al. (Case No.2:09-cv-01115-JCM-VCF) be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED without prejudice.
