Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

EMPLOYERS FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BASIC FOOD FLAVORS, INC., 2:10-cv-01109-JCM-VCF. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20120606b36 Visitors: 28
Filed: May 18, 2012
Latest Update: May 18, 2012
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge. On March 21, 2012, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Employers Fire Insurance Company and Defendant/Counter-Claimant Basic Food Flavors, Inc. filed the Joint Motion for Order Approving Settlement (# 74). A Joint Motion for Telephonic Status Conference on the Joint Motion for Order Approving Settlement (# 76) was filed on April 12, 2012 and the Court granted the motion and scheduled a telephonic status hearing for April 20, 2012 at 1:00 p.m.
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.

On March 21, 2012, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Employers Fire Insurance Company and Defendant/Counter-Claimant Basic Food Flavors, Inc. filed the Joint Motion for Order Approving Settlement (# 74). A Joint Motion for Telephonic Status Conference on the Joint Motion for Order Approving Settlement (# 76) was filed on April 12, 2012 and the Court granted the motion and scheduled a telephonic status hearing for April 20, 2012 at 1:00 p.m. At the status hearing on April 20, 2012, the Court heard representations from both sides regarding the Joint Motion for Order Approving Settlement and afterwards the Court ordered a hearing for May 15, 2012. The parties were ordered to deliver to chambers, the original signed, completed settlement agreement with all exhibits including Exhibit H by May 8, 2012. The original settlement agreement shall be filed in open court and Exhibit H will be filed under sealed. The parties were ordered to provide at least a 14-days notice of the hearing to all the known HVP claimants. HVP claimants will be allowed to participate telephonically at the May 15, 2012 hearing.

On May 15, 2012 at 2:00 p.m., the Court held a hearing on the Joint Motion for Order Approving Settlement (#74). Counsel and parties present are listed in the minutes of proceedings (#85). Defendant Basic Food Flavor, Inc.'s counsel, Mr. Joseph Garin informed the Court that notices of the hearing were properly distributed to the HVP Claimants pursuant to the Court's Order (#80). During the hearing, the Court admitted into evidence as Court Exhibit 1, the original fully signed settlement agreement without Exhibit H. Exhibit H to the settlement agreement was filed under sealed as Court Exhibit 2. The Court discusses in detail Section III of the settlement agreement pertaining to conditions 1 through 3 and opened the floor to all parties present for any objections or disputes to Section III of the settlement agreement. No objections were made by any of the parties or the HVP Claimants.

RECOMMENDATION

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the Joint Motion for Order Approving Settlement (#74) is Granted and the fully signed settlement agreement with Exhibit H and filed, respectively, as Court Exhibit 1 and filed under seal Court Exhibit 2 shall be approved.

NOTICE

Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2, any objection to this Finding and Recommendation must be in writing and filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days. The Supreme Court has held that the court of appeal may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waived the right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer