JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is defendant Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.'s ("Beazer") emergency motion to dismiss for failure to comply with pretrial procedure. (Doc. #120).
This case is set for calendar call on Wednesday June 13, 2012, and is scheduled to go to trial on Monday June 18, 2012. (Doc. #117). Beazer did not file the instant motions until Friday June 8, 2012. (Doc. #120).
The motion to dismiss argues that the court should dismiss the instant matter due to plaintiff Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company's ("Allied") alleged failure to comply with pretrial procedure. Specifically, Beazer asserts that Allied has failed to file its pre-trial witness and exhibit disclosures 30 days before trial, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3)(B). (Doc. #120).
. . .
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3)(A), parties must disclose the names of witnesses, a designation of witnesses whose testimony the party expects to present by deposition, and an identification of each document or other exhibit the party intends to offer at trial. "Unless the court orders otherwise," these disclosures must be made at least 30 days before trial. FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(3)(B).
On June 5, 2012, the court issued its order regarding trial. (Doc. #117). This order states that "[a]t calendar call counsel shall supply [the court] with the original and one copy of a complete exhibit list of all exhibits that are intended to be used during the trial. At the same time, counsel shall serve upon opposing counsel a copy of the same." (Doc. #117). The order regarding trial further states that "[a]t calendar call, counsel . . ., shall file with [the court] a list of witnesses expected to be called on behalf of each party . . . ." (Doc. #117).
Here, Allied has not failed to comply with pretrial procedure because the court ordered Allied to bring its witness list and exhibit disclosures to calendar call. (Doc. #117). Thus, Allied was not required to file its witness list and exhibit disclosures 30 days before trial. See FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(3)(B). Therefore, dismissal on this grounds is not appropriate.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.'s motion to dismiss for failure to comply with pretrial procedure (doc. #120) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.