VALDEZ v. COX COMMUNICATIONS LAS VEGAS, INC., 2:09-CV-01797-PMP-RJJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120621b56
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. The Court having read and considered a Motion to Intervene by Gregory Landers for Purpose of Appealing the court's Order of April 10, 2012 and its Prior Orders (Doc. #365) filed May 10, 2012, Defendants' Joint Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. #370) filed May 29, 2012 and Lander's Reply (Doc. #373) filed June 13, 2012, and for the reasons set forth in Defendants' Joint Response (Doc. #370), IT IS ORDERED that Gregory Landers' Motion to Intervene (Doc.
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. The Court having read and considered a Motion to Intervene by Gregory Landers for Purpose of Appealing the court's Order of April 10, 2012 and its Prior Orders (Doc. #365) filed May 10, 2012, Defendants' Joint Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. #370) filed May 29, 2012 and Lander's Reply (Doc. #373) filed June 13, 2012, and for the reasons set forth in Defendants' Joint Response (Doc. #370), IT IS ORDERED that Gregory Landers' Motion to Intervene (Doc. ..
More
ORDER
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
The Court having read and considered a Motion to Intervene by Gregory Landers for Purpose of Appealing the court's Order of April 10, 2012 and its Prior Orders (Doc. #365) filed May 10, 2012, Defendants' Joint Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. #370) filed May 29, 2012 and Lander's Reply (Doc. #373) filed June 13, 2012, and for the reasons set forth in Defendants' Joint Response (Doc. #370),
IT IS ORDERED that Gregory Landers' Motion to Intervene (Doc. #365) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
