GAINES v. COX, 2:11-cv-206-GMN-RJJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120702984
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53). The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53) and the docket herein and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that consistent with the Court's prior order, the parties shall file a joint, prop
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53). The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53) and the docket herein and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that consistent with the Court's prior order, the parties shall file a joint, propo..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53).
The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53) and the docket herein and good cause appearing therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that consistent with the Court's prior order, the parties shall file a joint, proposed discovery plan and scheduling order on or before July 12, 2012.
Source: Leagle
