HICKS v. C.R. BARD, INC., 2:12-cv-00749-KJD-RJJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20121120992
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2012
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge. The Unopposed Motion to Transfer Venue filed by Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and Davol Inc., is GRANTED. For the convenience of the witnesses and parties, and in the interests of justice, the Northern Division of the District of Nevada is a more appropriate venue for this action. Plaintiff could have brought his case in the Northern Division, and the balance of factors point towards the
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge. The Unopposed Motion to Transfer Venue filed by Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and Davol Inc., is GRANTED. For the convenience of the witnesses and parties, and in the interests of justice, the Northern Division of the District of Nevada is a more appropriate venue for this action. Plaintiff could have brought his case in the Northern Division, and the balance of factors point towards the N..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
The Unopposed Motion to Transfer Venue filed by Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and Davol Inc., is GRANTED.
For the convenience of the witnesses and parties, and in the interests of justice, the Northern Division of the District of Nevada is a more appropriate venue for this action. Plaintiff could have brought his case in the Northern Division, and the balance of factors point towards the Northern Division and away from the Southern Division of the District of Nevada as the appropriate venue.
Source: Leagle
