NIEMEYER v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 2:09-ov-2091-JCM-PAL. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20121121f46
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2012
Summary: JUDGMENT IN A CIVI ACTION FOLLOWING TRIAL BY JURY JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. This action was tried by a jury with the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan presiding. A jury of eight persons was regularly empanelled on the 29 th day of October, 2012, to hear said action; witnesses on behalf of the plaintif and the defendant were sworn and examined; and exhibits were offered and admitted by the Court on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant. After hearing the evidence, the instructions of
Summary: JUDGMENT IN A CIVI ACTION FOLLOWING TRIAL BY JURY JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. This action was tried by a jury with the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan presiding. A jury of eight persons was regularly empanelled on the 29 th day of October, 2012, to hear said action; witnesses on behalf of the plaintif and the defendant were sworn and examined; and exhibits were offered and admitted by the Court on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant. After hearing the evidence, the instructions of t..
More
JUDGMENT IN A CIVI ACTION FOLLOWING TRIAL BY JURY
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
This action was tried by a jury with the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan presiding. A jury of eight persons was regularly empanelled on the 29th day of October, 2012, to hear said action; witnesses on behalf of the plaintifß and the defendant were sworn and examined; and exhibits were offered and admitted by the Court on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant.
After hearing the evidence, the instructions of the Court, and the arguments of counsel, the jury retired to consider its findings and subsequently returned on the 7th day of November,2012, with a unanimous verdict in favor of Defendant Ford Motor Company and against Plaintiffs Kathryn A. Niemeyer, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Anthony Niemeyer, Mark Niemeyer, Jessica Niemeyer, and Rebecca Niemeyer, Pursuant to this special verdict, the jury found that the 2007 Ford Focus's driver's airbag system was not defective.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and Defendant Ford Motor Company recover costs from Plaintiffs as provided by law.
Source: Leagle
