Filed: Dec. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING DATE PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Defendant, EDWARD SORENSEN and by and through his attorney, Randall J. Roske, Esquire and between the Plaintiff, the United States of America, by and through its attorney, Roger Yang, AUSA, that the sentencing currently scheduled for December 17, 2012 at and continued to a time convenient to this Court, preferably about 90 days. This Stipulation is entered into for the
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING DATE PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Defendant, EDWARD SORENSEN and by and through his attorney, Randall J. Roske, Esquire and between the Plaintiff, the United States of America, by and through its attorney, Roger Yang, AUSA, that the sentencing currently scheduled for December 17, 2012 at and continued to a time convenient to this Court, preferably about 90 days. This Stipulation is entered into for the f..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING DATE
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Defendant, EDWARD SORENSEN and by and through his attorney, Randall J. Roske, Esquire and between the Plaintiff, the United States of America, by and through its attorney, Roger Yang, AUSA, that the sentencing currently scheduled for December 17, 2012 at and continued to a time convenient to this Court, preferably about 90 days.
This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons
1. The Defendant is not incarcerated and does not object to a continuance in this matter.
2. The Defendant's Pre-sentence Report was made available at a time when counsel was involved in intensive Jury Trial preparations in an unrelated case in Federal Court. Counsel and client were because of that fact, unable to meet in a timely fashion to go over the Pre-sentence Report in order to meet the deadline for filing the necessary Objections and Sentencing Memorandum. There are many factual matters identified by the client which need addressing, and requests additional time to prepare the requisite objections.
3. The Prosecutor in this case is not opposed to a continuance in this matter.
This is the first request to continue the sentencing in this matter.
ORDER
Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Sentencing currently scheduled for December 17, 2012, at the hour of 9:00 a.m. be vacated and the same be continued to the _______ day of Monday, March 18, 2013, at 10:00 a.m.
