Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROMMAN v. GAO, 2:11-cv-01178-MMD-CWH. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20130607d51 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2013
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. In its prior Order entered April 29, 2013 (dkt. no. 29), the Court granted Nominal Defendant Yuhe International, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (dkt. no. 23), on the grounds that Plaintiff Lana Romman, an unrepresented party, could not maintain a shareholder derivative action pro se. The Court dismissed the Complaint without prejudice, allowing Plaintiff thirty (30) days to obtain counsel and cure the deficiency. The Court stated that if Plaintiff did not obtai
More

ORDER

MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.

In its prior Order entered April 29, 2013 (dkt. no. 29), the Court granted Nominal Defendant Yuhe International, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (dkt. no. 23), on the grounds that Plaintiff Lana Romman, an unrepresented party, could not maintain a shareholder derivative action pro se. The Court dismissed the Complaint without prejudice, allowing Plaintiff thirty (30) days to obtain counsel and cure the deficiency. The Court stated that if Plaintiff did not obtain counsel within that time period, the Complaint would be dismissed with prejudice.

More than thirty (30) days have now passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any document with the Court or taken any other action indicating compliance with the Court's Order. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice pursuant to its prior Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer